Soft Drinks - America
The addict feels low. His body
needs a boost. He reaches into his pocket and finds a dollar bill. He slides it
into the machine and a can rolls out. He opens the can and guzzles. He feels
his energy return. His fix will last a couple of hours, enough to keep him
alert for the rest of the morning. The addict is twelve years old and his drug
is a soft drink, purchased from a vending machine in his school. This addict
and thousands like him will attend special classes, sponsored by his school, to
warn him about the dangers of drugs, tobacco and alcohol. But no one will tell
him about America's other drinking problem.
According to the National Soft
Drink Association (NSDA), consumption of soft drinks is now over 600 12-ounce
servings (12 oz.) per person per year. Since 1978, soda consumption in the us
has tripled for boys and doubled for girls. Young males age 12-29 are the
biggest consumers at over 160 gallons per year-that's almost 2 quarts per day.
At these levels, the calories from soft drinks contribute as much as 10 percent
of the total daily caloric intake for a growing boy.
TARGETING THE YOUNG
Huge increases in soft drink
consumption have not happened by chance-they are due to intense marketing
efforts by soft drink corporations. Coca Cola, for example, has set the goal of
raising consumption of its products in the US by at least 25 percent per year.
The adult market is stagnant so kids are the target.
Soft drink companies spend
billions on advertising. Much of these marketing efforts are aimed at children
through playgrounds, toys, cartoons, movies, videos, charities and amusement
parks; and through contests, sweepstakes, games and clubs via television,
radio, magazines and the internet. Their efforts have paid off. Last year soft
drink companies grossed over $57 billion in sales in the us alone, a colossal
amount.
In 1998 the Center for Science in
the Public Interest (CSPI) warned the public that soft drink companies were
beginning to infiltrate our schools and kid clubs. For example, they reported
that Coca-Cola paid the Boys & Girls Clubs of America $60 million to market
its brand exclusively in over 2000 facilities. Fast food companies selling soft
drinks now run ads on Channel One, the commercial television network with programming
shown in classrooms almost every day to eight million middle, junior and high
school students. In 1993, District 11 in Colorado Springs became the first
public school district in the us to place ads for Burger King in its hallways
and on the sides of its school buses. Later, the school district signed a
10-year deal with Coca-Cola, bringing in $11 million during the life of the
contract. This arrangement was later imitated all over Colorado. The contracts
specify annual sales quotas with the result that school administrators
encourage students to drink sodas, even in the classrooms. One high school in
Beltsville, Maryland, made nearly $100,000 last year on a deal with a soft
drink company.
EARLY WARNINGS
Warnings about the dangers of soft drink consumption came to
us as early as 1942 when the American Medical Association's (AMA) Council on
Food and Nutrition made the following noble statement:
"From the health point of view it is desirable
especially to have restriction of such use of sugar as is represented by
consumption of sweetened carbonated beverages and forms of candy which are of
low nutritional value. The Council believes it would be in the interest of the
public health for all practical means to be taken to limit consumption of sugar
in any form in which it fails to be combined with significant proportions of
other foods of high nutritive quality."
Since that time the first notable public outcry came in
1998, 56 years later, when the CSPI published a paper called "Liquid
Candy" blasting the food industry for "mounting predatory marketing
campaigns [especially] aimed at children and adolescents." At a press
conference, CSPI set up 868 cans of soda to represent the amount of soda the
average young male consumed during the prior year. For additional shock effect,
CSPI displayed baby bottles with soft drink logos such as Pepsi, Seven-up and
Dr. Pepper, highlighting a study that "found that parents are four times
more likely to feed their children soda pop when their children use those logo
bottles than when they don't." In "Liquid Candy" CSPI revealed
that even though, over a period of fifty years, soft drink production increased
nine times and by 1998 ".provided more than one-third of all refined
sugars in the diet, . . . the AMA and other health organizations [remained]
largely silent."
INGREDIENTS IN SOFT DRINKS-A WITCH'S BREW
High Fructose Corn Syrup, now used
in preference to sugar, is associated with poor development of collagen in
growing animals, especially in the context of copper deficiency. All fructose
must be metabolized by the liver. Animals on high-fructose diets develop liver
problems similar to those of alcoholics.
Aspartame, used in diet sodas, is a potent neurotoxin and
endocrine disrupter.Caffeine stimulates the adrenal gland without providing nourishment. In large amounts, caffeine can lead to adrenal exhaustion, especially in children.
Phosphoric acid, added to give soft drinks "bite," is associated with calcium loss.
Citric acid often contains traces of MSG, a neurotoxin.
Artificial Flavors may also contain traces of MSG.
Water may contain high amounts of fluoride and other contaminants.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar